phillynews215
06-18-2024, 09:11 AM
https://www.androidauthority.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/T-Mobile-logo-on-smartphone-1.jpg Credit: Edgar Cervantes / Android Authority
AT&T highlighted several T-Mobile advertisements around its “Price Lock†guarantee to the US National Advertising Division (NAD).
The NAD concluded that the policy descriptions fine print contradicted the main “Price Lock†claim, and hence, T-Mobile has to discontinue or modify its policy to explain how it differs from a price lock.
T-Mobile has stated that it will comply with the NADs decision.
Competition is necessary for consumers, not only to get more valid choices but also for the competitors to keep each other in check. T-Mobile (https://www.androidauthority.com/best-t-mobile-plans-786372/) has been in the news recently after it raised the prices of its home and internet plans, even those under a Price Lock guarantee, with the company using some fine print to try and get away with it. Thanks to competitor AT&T (https://www.androidauthority.com/att-plans-785600/), T-Mobile can no longer claim a price lock guarantee if it does not keep its prices locked.
As The Verge (https://www.theverge.com/2024/6/17/24180177/t-mobile-price-lock-stop-advertising-5g-home-internet-service) reports, the US National Advertising Division (NAD) recommended (https://bbbprograms.org/media-center/dd/t-mobile-price-lock) that T-Mobile discontinue or modify its “Price Lock†policy to explain how it “differs from a price lock which locks the price for the term of a service†to avoid conveying a misleading message to viewers and consumers. AT&T challenged T-Mobiles marketing and advertising claims, appearing in numerous print, online, and TV advertisements.
More... (https://www.androidauthority.com/t-mobile-price-lock-guarantee-advertising-3452195/)
AT&T highlighted several T-Mobile advertisements around its “Price Lock†guarantee to the US National Advertising Division (NAD).
The NAD concluded that the policy descriptions fine print contradicted the main “Price Lock†claim, and hence, T-Mobile has to discontinue or modify its policy to explain how it differs from a price lock.
T-Mobile has stated that it will comply with the NADs decision.
Competition is necessary for consumers, not only to get more valid choices but also for the competitors to keep each other in check. T-Mobile (https://www.androidauthority.com/best-t-mobile-plans-786372/) has been in the news recently after it raised the prices of its home and internet plans, even those under a Price Lock guarantee, with the company using some fine print to try and get away with it. Thanks to competitor AT&T (https://www.androidauthority.com/att-plans-785600/), T-Mobile can no longer claim a price lock guarantee if it does not keep its prices locked.
As The Verge (https://www.theverge.com/2024/6/17/24180177/t-mobile-price-lock-stop-advertising-5g-home-internet-service) reports, the US National Advertising Division (NAD) recommended (https://bbbprograms.org/media-center/dd/t-mobile-price-lock) that T-Mobile discontinue or modify its “Price Lock†policy to explain how it “differs from a price lock which locks the price for the term of a service†to avoid conveying a misleading message to viewers and consumers. AT&T challenged T-Mobiles marketing and advertising claims, appearing in numerous print, online, and TV advertisements.
More... (https://www.androidauthority.com/t-mobile-price-lock-guarantee-advertising-3452195/)